Talk:Interstate 69 in Kentucky

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Cwater1 in topic Remove Update Needed template

I-69 signs edit

I just drove the entire future I-69 corridor in Kentucky over the weekend in both directions. There are no I-69 signs up at the moment, just the future corridor signs are currently posted. --Holderca1 talk 13:28, 26 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Interstate 69 in Kentucky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:12, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Interstate 69 in Kentucky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:18, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

I-69 exit list edit

Should the part of the proposed I-69 from US 41 to the proposed Ohio River bridge should added onto the exit list. If added, it will need to be marked as unbuilt since it ain't open to traffic yet. Cwater1 (talk) 00:31, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Only if we know what the junctions are going to be and can cite them. There is a lot of speculation in proposals, so it's best to be cautious if we can't prove what we know. –Fredddie 06:41, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Remove Update Needed template edit

On top of this artocle, it has a update needed template. Not sure why it is still there. I'm pretty sure that this article has been updated since November 2010. Cwater1 (talk) 23:13, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply