Talk:Interstate 694

Latest comment: 5 months ago by NintendoTTTEfan2005 in topic Direction and Terminuses

History edit

I have some problems with the 2nd paragraph under history. First, and pedantically, MN-252 has never been US 52. At the time of completion of I-94, it was already MN-252 and before that it was US 169 (on a different alignment). The main problem is that there is no citation for this notion that "694 was never intended to be a full beltway". There is just no evidence for this and while there were indeed "TO" trailblazer signs I think they were there prior to the construction to full interstate standards.

I think this whole paragraph should be removed (likewise with the same paragraph in the I-494 article). Canth1 (talk) 16:10, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Absent any comment I went ahead and removed the offending paragraph.Canth1 (talk) 18:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why are factual items removed from this acticle. I have three times added information that is deleted. Even proving appropriate citations canth1 still removes pertinent information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.161.143.125 (talk) 02:53, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interstate 694. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:40, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Direction and Terminuses edit

Should the Terminuses be changed to "Counterclockwise end" and "Clockwise end"? NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 01:30, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply