Talk:Interstate 175

History

If all of the information came from AARoads, it should be cited at the end of the section instead of its current location. If it did not come entirely from AARoads, then additional refs will be needed. --TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 05:35, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Should the history section be remove? I honestly don't know how to fix it. They have mix of yellow and orange tag. --Freewayguy (Comm 90) 20:53, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

The entire history section is basically fragments of info that was poorly written when I created the section. Parts of it was from AARoads, while other fragments came from the shuttered Bayciti.net. I believe the entire section needs a complete rewrite and expansion in order to save the integrity of the article and keep it from being deleted. Wslupecki (talk) 01:25, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Why we have both orange and yellow tag; Talking about AA Highways is definitely original source. I fix it alittle bit.--Freewayguy ^{Talk Contribs} 19:39, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Speaking of South Pasadena for what?Rosemead?San Gabriel? Does I-710 have anything to do with this article when mention below yellow and orange tag?--Freewayguy ^{Discussions Show all changes} 19:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

I thouhgt you said AA Roads is not a valid source. For eventualism, they should have a valid source like DOT's maintence.--SCFReeways 02:41, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

History Tags Revisited

The tag about the tone of the History section is nearly four years old. I don't see any tone issues at present (though the section is short). Perhaps someone familiar with this article and this WikiProject could examine it and remove this tag if it's no longer appropriate? Wabbott9 Tell me about it.... 04:22, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Interstate funding

In 1976 both feeders were only going to get 90% Interstate funding to 9th Street. --NE2 15:31, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Interstate 175. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120208015944/http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/statistics/hwydata/interchange.pdf to http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/statistics/hwydata/interchange.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140306153400/http://www2.dot.state.fl.us/Straight-linesOnlineGIS/ to http://www2.dot.state.fl.us/Straight-linesOnlineGIS/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:03, 12 April 2017 (UTC)