Doesn't an article covering interpretations of a movie need more than one source? Otherwise I would conclude that all of this information is just copied from the book. Beach drifter (talk) 01:12, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Same here. Get more references, otherwise it's plagerism. --Bismarck43 (talk) 01:57, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
- I created a sub-article because I expected to add more interpretations, of which the sum would not fit in the main article. I have not had time to add them here. If you can help, a lot of references can be found at Talk:Psycho (1960 film)/references. Erik (talk) 05:19, 15 February 2010 (UTC)