Talk:Interpretation (linguistics)
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 19 April 2016. The result of the discussion was merge to Language interpretation. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled edit
Why is this article in an encyclopedia? Shouldn't it be in Wictionary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.225.177.161 (talk • contribs) 08:42, 29 January 2006
- It does read like a dictionary entry (although wouldn't be good as that either) and repeats itself several times. I'll work on removing (or moving) the top two meanings and leaving the uses in works of art, as well as removing redundancy.
- Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 23:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
I have my doubts in relation with the link to Babels. May I remind here that Babels is not an organization representing interpreters, but an association of interpreters WITHIN the Social Forum movement.
I suggest its substitution with a link to the AIIC (Association Internationale d'Interprètes de Conférence) website, a professional union distinguished for its labour in favour of adequate working standards for interpreters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.120.105.222 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 22 October 2006
I aggree. The link to Babels is out of place.
I also think that this article should be merged with interpreting, since both terms are synonims. --195.252.86.41 22:22, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Merge With Interpreting edit
I agree that this article is not necessary and thus turned it into a redirect. The Interpreting article seemed to cover everything, but if I missed something just add it in there.Man It's So Loud In Here 17:45, 5 September 2007 (UTC)