Talk:Interpress
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Is it really "InterPress"? I thought it was "Interpress" (with a lowercase 'p').
Actually, as the last of the "Interpress" software engineers, I can verify that it is lowercase 'p'. I hope to add more to this page soon. Gmb14502 20:47, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Requested move edit
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed for over a week. Jenks24 (talk) 11:18, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
InterPress → Interpress – Apperently as per the discussion above and Xerox documentation such as [1] the name was not camelcased. I can't do this move myself because Interpress is a redirect to InterPress and needs to be deleted first. Peter Flass (talk) 00:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Broken External Reference Link edit
The third external reference link (http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/xerox/xns/standards/XSIG_038306_Introduction_to_Interpress_Jun1983.pdf) returns 404 now. 76.145.9.182 (talk) 16:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Is supported edit
"... is supported in Xerox Ventura Publisher"
Sure sounds like Interpress is a thing in use, doesn't it? Until you look up VP and find out the final release was in 2002. And the references are from the 1980s. So is Interpress still relevant, or is it some dusty tech that hasn't been used for decades? The article doesn't give a clue. 2A02:AA1:1626:E371:C0D9:8F95:ED37:A646 (talk) 15:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC)