Talk:Internet as a source of prior art

Introduction paragraph

The introduction paragraph does not read as though this article is from an encyclopedia, and should be reworded. It should begin with the title of the article. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 16:21, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

I have modified the introduction paragraph. Thanks. --Edcolins 17:25, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

There's too much jargon here for a general readership

Just my opinion.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 21:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Please could you be more specific.. What is unclear? I am ready to help and insert more explanation, but I would need more information. Thanks. --Edcolins 20:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

I have expanded the background section and removed the "confusion" tag for now. --Edcolins 21:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

It just doesn't read that smoothly for me, although maybe it was just my state of mind at the time that made me tag it like that.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 00:39, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Graphic

Is the graphic really relevant?--Nowa (talk) 21:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Could we find something better? A search report or information disclosure statement (or both) citing an internet page possibly? --Edcolins (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2009 (UTC)