Talk:Internationalized country code top-level domain

Latin equivalence? edit

Something the article doesn't indicate is if the internationalized TLD is equivalent to the Latin TLD. eg: ‏مصر.‎, being functionally the same as .eg, or whether the same domain in both can be owned by different parties. Sounds like a confusing mess to me, that'll hurt the internet more than it helps. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.53.168.233 (talk) 20:18, 9 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fixed. HaŋaRoa (talk) 15:12, 10 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Not very helpful edit

This article states historical facts, but is not useful.

For instance, - how does one recognize an internationalized country code? - where is the list which can be used to decode such a code? - how can one type such a code with a "standard" (Latin) keyboard? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.170.243.158 (talk) 06:09, 8 May 2010 (UTC)Reply


It will get there. For now, consider reading Punycode. Fwiiw, I think this is all gimmick and does more harm than good. --92.106.52.39 (talk) 09:27, 8 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Improved edit



I just cleared up some dodgey bracketing.
Mod MMG (User Page) Reply on my talkpage. Do NOT click this link 05:36, 8 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

representing 11 languages? edit

In line with the subject it would make more sense to assume here 11-scripts/alphabets are used. However, the source indeed states "languages". Does anyone have the 11/21 languages involved to see what's right? L.tak (talk) 16:38, 8 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

What about Greek alphabet. edit

Is it there yet? [Any Sources supporting it?] --62.1.57.132 (talk) 17:40, 8 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Citation needed? edit

The sentence "Currently Russia uses .ru, which in Cyrillic transliterates as "ру", which is confusingly similar to .py, the TLD of Paraguay" is followed by a "Citation needed". Why? The similarity between "py" and "ру" should be obvious, and the transliteration is evident to anyone who consults a list of the Russian alphabet.

So what kind of citation is required?--Oz1cz (talk) 21:24, 8 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

It's not the ru/py part that needed citing, strictly speaking, but the assertion that it's confusing. I found a ref, in any case. —Korath (Talk) 23:18, 8 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
I moved the paragraph to .рф. HaŋaRoa (talk) 15:56, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Transliterations edit

Would someone please add the (approximate) transliterations for the Arabic scripts? One is presently listed for Egypt, but this would be better placed at the first occurrence. Thank-you, Colin MacLaurin (talk) 01:45, 9 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

See List of Internet top-level domains#Internationalized country codes. HaŋaRoa (talk) 15:16, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Greece edit

Why has Greece currently no internationalized country code top-level domain? --84.61.186.139 (talk) 18:27, 7 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Use of International TLDs in a country article edit

Hello,

There is currently a debate on whether International TLDs should or should not be included in the article of Singapore. Anyone is free to join the discussion. --RaviC (talk) 21:48, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • First off, it is not a debate when we are discussing things on the discussion page and the relevancy of it, unless you are out to make it into a debate. Please get your facts right. --Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 22:20, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Japan edit

Why has Japan currently no internationalized country code top-level domain? --84.61.137.197 (talk) 08:00, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Internationalized country code top-level domain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:46, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

"افغانستان." listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect افغانستان. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 27 § افغانستان. until a consensus is reached. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 16:25, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply