This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
This article was selected as the article for improvement on 5 August 2013 for a period of one week.
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Alderson Broaddus University/International Law (Spring 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.
This article was selected as the article for improvement on 11 December 2023 for a period of one week.
^Dixon, Martin (2013). Textbook on International law (7th ed.). Oxford Press. pp. 286–319. ISBN978-0-19-957445-2.
^Dixon, Martin; McCorquodale, Robert; Williams, Sarah (2011). Cases and Materials on International Law (5th ed.). Oxford Press. pp. 479–521. ISBN978-0-19-956271-8. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
^Fenwick, C. [Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=law&searchText=and&searchText=international&searchText=trade&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dlaw%2Band%2Binternational%2Btrade%26amp%3Bprq%3Dlaw%2Binternational%2Btrade%26amp%3Bgroup%3Dnone%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3Bso%3Drel%26amp%3Bhp%3D25%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bacc%3Don&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents ""International Law and International Trade""]. JSTOR. American Society of International Law. Retrieved March 4, 2015. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Isn't this section a bit weasel-wordy (or whatever it is you guys call it)? Not that I disagree, but saying TRIPS has "arguably" caused lower access to patented medicines is not really an argument at all. 139.80.123.38 (talk) 02:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Although lex maritima is equated with lex mercatoria in the article I can hardly accept the translation of lex maritima as the "law of merchants on the sea". Might it not be simply translated as maritime law? There is a strong case to be made for the existence of a modern lex maritima as an independent set of principles and customs although it is as yet uncodified. Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 01:25, 15 March 2014 (UTC)Reply