Talk:International Space Station/GA2

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Robert Skyhawk in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I will review this article. Robert Skyhawk (Talk to me) 18:48, 6 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Review by Robert Skyhawk edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    The writing is very reader-friendly; there weren't any parts that I couldn't understand. Good wikilinking too.
    B. MoS compliance:  
    Solid lead section, and no complaints about the body.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    I believe this article easily passes the criteria; I will promote it to GA status. Congratulations to all involved editors. Robert Skyhawk (Talk to me) 20:10, 7 December 2008 (UTC)Reply