This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This redirect has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
The '65 and '85 groups are the two referred to by the two usages of the word "both" in the early part of this article. Are those statements also true of the '62 group, in which case, "both" should become "all three" or simply "they"? BobFromBrockley 10:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
The IG that split from the RSL in '61 was the same group who re-entered it in '64 and left finally in '65 so there are only two groups. I'll re write it to make that clear.Haldraper (talk) 21:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
That's much better. Thanks! --Duncan (talk) 23:05, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I oppose the proposal to delete. While the two groups are notable only in their relationship to the RSL and IMG, in the 1960s, and to the IMG and Socialist Outlook in the 1980s, it would be laborious to duplicate this content into those four pages, and we would lose the level of detail here. Duncan (talk) 20:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
