Talk:International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days ![]() |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Index
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Sources
editThe sourcing for this entry needs work, but one problematic reference in particular is Haq, M. Zahurul (5 August 2011). M.N. Schmitt, Louise Arimatsu, T. McCormack, ed. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law - 2010 (1st ed.). Springer. p. 463. ISBN 978-9067048101. I can't access the publication, but there are only 400 pages in the book, so clearly something is inaccurate about this reference. Bangabandhu (talk) 21:13, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Bangabandhu: I may have access to the source; I'll check this weekend. If I don't, the extremely helpful folks at Resource Request can almost certainly get it. They won't email a whole eBook, but if you describe what you're trying to verify they'll search the source and try to identify the page(s) it came from. Worldbruce (talk) 01:40, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for this. Didn't know that resource existed, it could be very useful. I'll go ask them about the reference now. Bangabandhu (talk) 07:00, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
EU resolutions of support
editCurrently, the entry reads: "The EU has passed three resolutions supporting the trials" which is sourced to this article. That article doesn't cite the resolutions by name, referencing a Peter Custers. I would like to know what the three resolutions were, if they exist. I suspect that the characterization of the EU's view in this article is more accurate. The EU didn't provide a wholesale endorsement to or support of the ICT, but recognized that the Bangladeshi people had prioritized it. Would welcome more sources, as I think this is problematic as it currently stands. From this 2010 Economist article - "The United Nations and Western governments are wary of lending support to a tribunal unless it conforms to international standards of due process" which does not fit with the existence of three EU resolutions in support. Bangabandhu (talk) 18:14, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130128174852/http://icsforum.org/blog/icsf/text-of-speech-before-the-eu-parliaments-delegation-by-ict-prosecutor to http://icsforum.org/blog/icsf/text-of-speech-before-the-eu-parliaments-delegation-by-ict-prosecutor/
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130415235147/http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/bangladesh-stop-harassment-of-defense-at-war-tribunal to http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/bangladesh-stop-harassment-of-defense-at-war-tribunal
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140413142430/http://www.newagebd.com/detail.php?date=2013-02-07&nid=39332 to http://www.newagebd.com/detail.php?date=2013-02-07&nid=39332
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130515115950/http://www.daily-sun.com/details_yes_09-11-2012_Jamaat-desperately-on-the-offensive_314_1_1_1_7.html to http://www.daily-sun.com/details_yes_09-11-2012_Jamaat-desperately-on-the-offensive_314_1_1_1_7.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:35, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Why is Ashrafuz Zaman Khan not listed among the "Accused and Verdicts"? He was convicted on 3 Nov 2013 along with Chowdhury Mueen-Uddin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.89.212.120 (talk) 15:24, 4 April 2018 (UTC)