Talk:International Classification of Procedures in Medicine

Proposed merge with International Classification of Health Interventions

edit

Essentially the same subject Rathfelder (talk) 13:25, 3 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • Disagree as the rationale for merging is not compliant with the origin of the UN WHO defined ICHI as a reference classification and any other clasification as ICP with whatever intention. What a nonense to intend merging, as the similar purpose does not formally justify any merger. It is as with marriage: You may marry just one woman or man at a time, though the sex does not define too much material difference between human individuals. However, no individual spouse would agree to get merged into a community just argued by gender or ashes. Please improve contents and do not focus neither on saving space nor on kneading headlines.Drahtloser (talk) 17:08, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per the comment I made when creating the article: i.e. this ICPM stub could be used to start a history section over at the ICHI stub (though it will need copyediting). Also, from a policy point of view, whilst the out-of-print ICPM is a predecessor to the (currently) unpublished ICHI, the lack of adoption of ICPM means that it probably fails WP:GNG for having it's own article. Little pob (talk) 07:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • support as above probably fails WP GNG--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:20, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Agreed and   Done Klbrain (talk) 13:17, 23 November 2017 (UTC)Reply