Talk:International Charter 'Space and Major Disasters'

Requested move 14 May 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. There is a consensus that the proposed title is operational shorthand, and not suitable for the title of an encylopaedia article. (non-admin closure) RGloucester — ☎ 22:28, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

---

International Charter on Space and Major Disasters → International Charter Space and Major Disasters – No "on" in title of Charter. kencf0618 (talk) 20:08, 14 May 2016 (UTC) --Relisted. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:34, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

• Oppose - the actual title of the charter is "Charter On Cooperation To Achieve The Coordinated Use Of Space Facilities In The Event Of Natural Or Technological Disasters" [1]. The phrase "International Charter 'Space and Major Disasters'" is used as a shortname in some documents and on the organization's webpages (with and without the single quotes around 'Space and Major Disasters'). The current article title: "International Charter on Space and Major Disasters" is used as well in RS independent of the organization. I think it is grammatically prudent to leave the "on" in the title. --Mike Cline (talk) 14:57, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
• Oppose per Mike Cline. The proposed title makes no sense. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on International Charter on Space and Major Disasters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131111231659/http://www.disasterscharter.org/c/document_library/get_file?p_l_id=23109&folderId=172718&name=DLFE-4704.pdf to http://www.disasterscharter.org/c/document_library/get_file?p_l_id=23109&folderId=172718&name=DLFE-4704.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110316002512/http://www.disasterscharter.org/web/charter/activation_details?p_r_p_1415474252_assetId=ACT-359 to http://www.disasterscharter.org/web/charter/activation_details?p_r_p_1415474252_assetId=ACT-359

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Request to update page

Hi All

I am requesting permission to update this page so that the content is inline with the German and French versions (I did not edit them). I have been asked to do this a favour for the Charter itself purely because I am already an (infrequently) editor on Wikipedia, I am not paid by the Charter. I do not see this as a conflict of interests because all I am doing is an English translation of information which is already on other versions of this page, thus making Wikipedia consistent.

Please let me know if this is possible (my previous efforts to edit the page have been reverted by another editor).

Thanks, WebSanny

talk 12:51, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

The English version seems to be much more fully referenced than either the French or the German version. In general there is no attempt to make different language versions consistent; each is self-governing, and they have different policies, guidelines, and standards. If one were to wish to make the articles more consistent, it would be sensible to make the others more consistent with the best. --David Biddulph (talk) 13:12, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Results

Can we see any of the images resulting from this initiative online? Do any have an open licence? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:01, 8 August 2020 (UTC)