Talk:International Association of Fire Fighters

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Redbarron1957 in topic Opinions of the IAFF, not information

Giuliani stuff POV edit

Sorry, Rudy has made rebuttals that should be noted. It appears that the IAFF President is an active Democrat, also unclear if Rudy declined to attend before or after the union began criticizing him... (This unsigned comment left by 66.72.215.225 (talk · contribs) 17:10, 12 July 2007) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.124.211.217 (talk) 22:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.124.211.217 (talk) 23:00, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Population protection Career vs Volunteer edit

Please stop editing the percentage of population protection. The correct % is 62 career 38 volunteer. The percentage being interjected is accurate of the % of career dept's vs volunteer in the country, not the % of population protected! — Preceding unsigned comment added by JTomo170 (talkcontribs) 17:00, 1 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Reads like a promotion for the IAFF edit

This article appears to have been written by a person or persons working for the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF). It reads as if it has been lifted straight from the IAFF homepage. It is not an objective, disinterested, encyclopaedic article. Because it fails the test of objectivity, it needs a complete overhaul by a team of editors who are not members of or paid by the IAFF.124.177.118.17 (talk) 11:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on International Association of Fire Fighters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International Association of Fire Fighters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:01, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Opinions of the IAFF, not information edit

This page appears to be a political support tool for the IAFF. The edits seem to only support the agenda of the IAFF and its membership instead of providing meaningful, unbiased and accurate information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redbarron1957 (talkcontribs) 04:25, 20 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

To resolve issues of perceived bias, it is required to provide specific information on what statements are disputed, and for what reason.-- Theoprakt (talk) 00:02, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, that's not how Wikipedia works. You can't just "drive by", slap a bunch of dispute and maintenance tags on a page, and then never be heard of again. In lack of a proper discussion I am removing the tags. -- Theoprakt (talk) 12:22, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

And am I suppose to talk to myself? Redbarron1957 (talk) 03:58, 17 May 2019 (UTC)Reply