Talk:Inter Press Service

Untitled

This page is definite NPOV. Needs to be addressed with more balanced language. Njerseyguy 04:07, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Can you be specific about what you think is POV? Otherwise I think the tag should be removed since neither you nor anyone else has provided examples of specific problems, or solutions.--Tirpse77 (talk) 00:57, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

For example:

"However, it seems that IPS has played a significant part in shaping the modern media and their news. Some of its structural innovations have been adopted by other international media organizations, most notably regarding the employment of local journalists for the coverage of developing countries. Furthermore, IPS claims to have led the way to a particular style of news (by demonstrating that in-depth analysis is as much part of the news as immediate coverage of the "facts”) and to raising awareness about less "newsworthy" topics, such as poverty or the environment."

Somebody has got to be kidding?

Sgmiller (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 23:26, 21 September 2008 (UTC).

Assuming that the info is verifiable from the sources provided, that is easy to clean up. Changing the "it seems that" to "According to so-and-so" should do it. I assume that the last sentence is an issue for you, but as it is simply forthrightly stating a claim (assuming verifiability) by IPS, there is no problem. 68.73.114.58 (talk) 12:14, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Mediascape

"The agency has established a niche in the international mediascape" – It appears to me that the author of that sentence used the term "mediascape" to simply mean "media landscape", but the way "mediascape" is used in this (Inter Press Service) article and sentence seems at odds with what the mediascape article currently says on its subject. 31.18.248.254 (talk) 15:09, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Inter Press Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150615023034/http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/81623_Respected-journalist-Fitzroy-Nation-dies to http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/81623_Respected-journalist-Fitzroy-Nation-dies

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:30, 19 January 2018 (UTC)