Talk:Intel MPX

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Intel MPX article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security (assessed as Mid-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Intel (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Intel, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.IntelWikipedia:WikiProject IntelTemplate:WikiProject IntelIntel articles

Contested deletion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Emperor-Overlord100 (talk) 19:42, 7 September 2013 (UTC) What? This page doesn't advertise anything.Reply

What on earth do you think it is doing? It has a download link! Fiddle Faddle 19:43, 7 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

It has link to Intel architecture extensions reference documents. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emperor-Overlord100 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 7 September 2013 (UTC) Showing reference material is not advertisement.--Emperor-Overlord100 (talk) 20:26, 7 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

New section edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This page looks from the very 1st statement like an advertise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.85.118.36 (talk) 16:48, 13 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

The potential trouble comes from the fact it's still only an announced feature, not available in any of the readily available products beside the Intel's emulator software. However, the content is backed by a few references. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 18:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Explain compatibility edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article should discuss what happens when MPX code is run on a non-MPX processor. Simsong (talk) 11:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Well, such a combination simply wouldn't work, as the MPX extension introduces new instructions and registers. Pretty much similar to the MMX extension, for example. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 12:18, 29 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic