Talk:Institutes of Eminence
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Aseleste in topic Requested move 30 April 2021
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Institutes of Eminence article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A fact from Institutes of Eminence appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 November 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 30 April 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to Institutions of Eminence. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:01, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
( )
- ... that ten public and ten private institutes are going to be declared Institutes of Eminence in India? Source: "The scheme is going to include twenty institutes, ten private and ten public ones." ("Accordingly, the Government / UGC approved the scheme of providing Regulatory Architecture for setting up / upgrading of 20 Institutions (10 from public sector & 10 from private sector)" [1]
- ALT1:... that a scheme for declaring ten public and ten private institutes as Institutes of Eminence was approved in India? Same, maybe more wordy
- Reviewed: Helmuth Froschauer.
Created by Muhandes (talk). Self-nominated at 11:54, 22 October 2019 (UTC).
- This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline and either hook could be used, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright or plagiarism issues. A QPQ needs to be done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:13, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: Reviewed Helmuth Froschauer. --Muhandes (talk) 16:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. Now good to go. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:10, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Requested move 30 April 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. Not seeing good arguments for moving or not moving. (closed by non-admin page mover) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 10:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Institutes of Eminence → Institutions of Eminence – in most places they used Institutions instead of Institutes 2405:204:A60B:4367:B961:7B00:E7F2:2663 (talk) 07:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. Bada Kaji (talk) 15:52, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:36, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- @2405:204:A60B:4367:B961:7B00:E7F2:2663 and Muhandes: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:37, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- I suspect WP:COMMONNAME, see [2] and [3]. See also official contradicting source. Whichever is the case, this is not uncontroversial, and should be discussed on the talk page.--Muhandes (talk) 09:27, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.