Talk:Inspirations for James Bond/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 12:20, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "were taken"

   Done - SchroCat (^ • @) 16:07, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

   "which came both from English spy and polymath John Dee and the breaking of a World War I German diplomatic code, and Bond's character and tastes, which came from, as Fleming himself put it "all the secret agents and commando types I met during the war", as well as Fleming himself." - shorten this sentence; maybe something like, "which came both from English spy and polymath John Dee, the breaking of a World War I German diplomatic code, Bond's character and tastes, as well as Fleming himself." I removed the clause I found redundant.

   Done - SchroCat (^ • @) 16:07, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

   Any copyright issues? What was James Bond's response?

   Not entirely sure I follow you here - could you clarify? As to Bond's response, it's referred to in the text ("a charming couple who are amused by the whole joke".[7])

   Forget this, I assume my brain did not work very well during this time...--♫GoP♫_T^C_N 10:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

   Name of the cigarette brand? With Morland, do you mean Morland, Cumbria?

   Done - SchroCat (^ • @) 16:07, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

   "sixty cigarettes a day", "80 cigarettes a day" - use consistent style

   Done - SchroCat (^ • @) 16:07, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

   Will review the table later

   "blowing up an Italian ship single-handedly himself" I am not sure why we need "himself" at the end.

   Done - SchroCat (^ • @) 10:57, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Very good! Another great work! :)--♫GoP♫_T^C_N 11:22, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

That's great news - many thanks indeed! - SchroCat (^ • @) 11:28, 14 February 2012 (UTC)