Talk:Inside Out 2

Most watch

It is the second most watched animated trailer to the lion king remake

Fan Of Lion King 🦁 (talk) 18:14, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Source doesn't mention the remake of The Lion King because according to Disney, the film was not an anіmated fіlm but a live-action reboot. LancedSoul (talk) 18:43, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Fun 2603:8081:2300:5F90:39FB:272C:1232:C9E4 (talk) 22:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

The Hollywood Reporter confirmed it was eligible for the animation category at the Oscars for that year. That is in addition to the substantial coverage of its animated credentials at The Lion King (2019 film). How Disney chose to market the film is their business, but Wikipedia's business is to document facts. Fan Of Lion King 🦁 (talk) 22:47, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

References

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://thenerdsofcolor.org/2024/04/16/inside-out-2-footage-reaction-pixar-gets-in-touch-with-new-emotions/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Rusty4321 ^{talk contribs} 23:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Production company credit

The billing block on the poster states "Disney presents a Pixar Studios Animation film". No mention is made of any other Disney entity other than its subsidiary Pixar Animation Studios. Specifically "Walt Disney Pictures" another subsidiary, isn't mentioned in the billing block. "Walt Disney Pictures" has been added to the infobox as a production company based on the assumption that "Disney" in the billing block means "Walt Disney Pictures" but even then a "presents" credits isn't a production credit, it is a distribution credit - they didn't make the film. Argument for including "Walt Disney Pictures" as production studio is that is how it is done on other Pixar film articles. I don't consider what other articles do as sufficient reason. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Walt Disney Pictures has been credited succinctly as "Disney" for well over a decade now in their films; it is simply how the studio has gone by name-wise since 2012. Countless of films feature studios that encompass both production and distribution duties. Your assertion that "a "presents" credits isn't a production credit, it is a distribution credit" lacks any verifiability. This is according to whom? Yourself? Your interpretation of a movie poster is original research. ~ Jedi94 (Want to tell me something?) 06:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

The other animated film articles getting it wrong doesn't mean this one must follow them, if anything they should be changed to remove Walt Disney Pictures as a production company. If Disney were a production credit it would say that, it doesn't, it says "presents". Walt Disney Pictures, per its article, produces live-action films, and the animated films produced by Walt Disney Animation Studios and Pixar Animation Studios are released under its banner thus the presents credit. They had nothing to do with producing the film, just releasing it. Look at the actual credits in the film for Inside Out. Copyright is held by Disney Enterprises Inc./Pixar. The actual end credits say "distributed by Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures" followed by "created and produced at Pixar Animation Studios". Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

To add see Opening credits § Common opening credits order. Pretty clear that industry practice is the studio with the presents credit and listed first is the distributor. Walt Disney Pictures is listed as commonly getting the distributor's presents credit. The second company listed is the actual production company. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

You know you're a legit moron who causes the entire insanity? I don't care about your stupidity, I don't cause about you knowledge, At least nobody gives a crap about Disney being credited and also in opening credits and logo in Pixar and WDAS were all featured Walt Disney Pictures logo in it, even credited as they're involved of the film, they're all also credited as co-production with, so it's not like you're doing anything against it, I begged you and begged you to stop and you just didn't

Listen, Walt Disney Pictures produced most of Pixar and WDAS movies you idiot! What do you think who produced it? A24? IFC FILMS? PARAMOUNT PICTURES? WARNER BROS. PICTURES? STOP IT AND RESET IT BACK TO NORMAL OR ELSE I'M GOING TO BLOCK YOU!! 105.158.93.224 (talk) 19:50, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

No Walt Disney Pictures just releases the films produced by Disney's animation studios under their banner. Basically slap on the flagship Disney film logos and claim presents. That is the limit of their involvement. They are not involved in producing the films just releasing them as stated in the articles. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

@Geraldo Perez Then Put Walt Disney Pictures credit, you IDIOT! it's not Universal Pictures and DreamWorks Animation! Of course, DreamWorks made their films and Universal released them, despite Universal didn't get their credit, but at least they marketed it and advertised it and promoted it worldwide, and do you forget about Columbia Pictures and Sony Pictures Animation? Yeah Columbia released Sony Animation films (execpt The Star, Hotel Transylvania 3, and The Angry Birds Movie 2) but most of SPA films do have a disturbution credit "Columbia Pictures" presents on, and also it's not about your stupid Disney's Limit of their involvement, it's about what the film's studio is and their producing in the film, you always hated things the way they were, you think Disney has nothing to do with Pixar and WDAS! well you're wrong! if it it wasn't for Disney in their Animatied films Category, then Who The Hell produced a lot of Pixar and WDAS films? you think that Disney only releases it? no! they produced it! if I heard another word of negative thoughts, I sentence you to be Blocked! 41.141.206.116 (talk) 15:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Pixar and WDAS are Disney studios who produce animated films. That is shown in the credits. Disney Pictures produces live-action films and releases films produced by the animation studios under its banner, that is the limit of their involvement. It isn't the animated film's production company. The three are peer studios owned by Disney Studios. Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures does the marketing, promotion and distribution for all of them. I think some of the confusion is conflating Disney Pictures with its owner Disney Studios. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

@Geraldo Perez No It is the animated film's production company, just because it is shown in the credits, doesn't mean that is the limit of their involvement, you said Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures does the marketing, promotion and distribution for all of them, and it drives me CRAZY AND MAD! because What are you talking about? Are you a Scam? I thought I told you to bring Walt Disney Pictures credit back on all Animated films, but you weren't listening, and here you are, Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures has nothing to do with this, Walt Disney Pictures does the marketing, promotion, and producing for all of them? Stop this! and do as I Say! 41.141.206.116 (talk) 16:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

You don't seem to understand Disney's film production organization at all. Suggest you go to the articles and read them for the detail of what role each part plays. You seem to be confusing Walt Disney Pictures with The Walt Disney Studios, its parent. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

@Jedi94 Help Me! 41.141.206.116 (talk) 15:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

After taking a step back and reevaluating, I think it would be best to keep Walt Disney Pictures out of the production company parameter unless there are some verifiable sources (like Variety, Hollywood Reporter or AFI) that explicitly name it as a production company. This is just to uphold Wikipedia's policies for consistency. After careful consideration, I think the best alternative would be leaving a footnote in the distribution field denoting that the film is released under the Walt Disney Pictures banner, as that is still a fact. I have gone ahead and adjusted the majority of Disney Animation and Pixar film articles to this effect. I think this method should satisfy both sides of the argument! ~ Jedi94 (Want to tell me something?) 23:10, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Looks good to me. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:48, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Riley Make the Team?

How Long are we gonna keep the Notes as the End Scene left ambiguous and determinant that Riley did accepted by Firehawk? I'd say 90% on her proud smile at the end, She might be accepted. Happiness is Simple (talk) 23:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)