Talk:Innerbelt Bridge

Soliciting assistance

There is a wealth of information on the Innerbelt Bridge, from its construction in the 1950s to the current plan to replace it with new twin spans over the next few years, so it is plenty notable to have an article. All of this is overwhelming, though, so I'm just going to set up a skeleton and let more experienced writers have at it. Good sources from which to cull information will be included in the References and External Links sections momentarily. Mapsax (talk) 18:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Status of funding for new bridge

It looks like the state and city are going to be arguing over funding for the second bridge for some time. Is it appropriate then to put a current event template at the top of the "Reconstruction" section? Mapsax (talk) 07:17, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

I don't think so. The templates are intended for situations when circumstances are changing rapidly, which doesn't apply here. We should be fine if you keep doing what you have been. - Eureka Lott 03:51, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Tremont access controversy

There have been rumblings in the Tremont neighborhood about the second bridge delay causing access inconveniences – a webpage with a direct message is at http://tremontwest.org/index/news-app?story=32 (1/31/12 press release) but I'm sure that I could dig up third-party media citations. Worth a mention or too much deviation from NPOV? Mapsax (talk) 06:33, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Discrepancy of length in sources

While reverting the length of the bridge after an unsourced IP edit, I noticed that the two sources listing it, the two listed as the sources in the infobox, differ: 4,233 vs. 4,223. Obviously one was a bad transcription. As noted in the hidden comment in the infobox, I went with the Encyclopedia's figure. Pre-revert it was the book's. Mapsax (talk) 14:39, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Innerbelt Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131110194029/http://www.dot.state.oh.us/projects/ClevelandUrbanCoreProjects/Innerbelt/InnerbeltBridge/NewsInformation/Pages/ProjectOverview.aspx to http://www.dot.state.oh.us/projects/ClevelandUrbanCoreProjects/Innerbelt/InnerbeltBridge/NewsInformation/Pages/ProjectOverview.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 14 November 2017 (UTC)