Talk:Infrastructure of the Brill Tramway/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by DavidCane in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DavidCane (talk) 23:37, 31 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    made some copy edits
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    very widely sourced
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    not much more could be said. Main articles and station articles, cover all other aspects.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Yep
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Once again a superior product from the House of Iridescent.--DavidCane (talk) 00:59, 1 August 2010 (UTC)Reply