Talk:Infrastructure for Peace

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 10 July 2015 by reviewer Sulfurboy (talk · contribs).

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Title

Latest comment: 19 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The topic here is currently unclear:

infrastructures for peace - that are most widely referred to in the plural, like crimes against humanity is that article's title, not crime against humanity, even though the singular is used by the ICC; vs
infrastructure for peace - often talked about in the plural, but also talked about for specific infrastructures, not just the infrastructures as an ensemble; vs
Infrastructures for Peace or Infrastructure for Peace as a formalised administrative/political/legal object.

I would tend to go for infrastructure for peace, with the idea that this is/these are a real thing/s, not just jargon. The sources do seem to consider these to be real things, not just a formal name. Boud (talk) 22:16, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic