Source edit

Good profile of the new Canadian commissioner. --Padraic 22:40, 21 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 18 September 2016 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move unopposed (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 03:59, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply


Information CommissionerInformation commissioner – Common name, written without capitals (as, for instance, prime minister). Geny S. Soboes (talk) 20:12, 18 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Support per name. Used here as a generic job title. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:10, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Overlap between this and National data protection authority edit

The scope of this article seems to be quite similar to National data protection authority. That one has a better national list, and this one has better text.

Any interest among editors to try to harmonize these two pages? Not necessarily a merge, but perhaps turning the NDPA article into a "list of" and the other one into a more narrative article? Or merging the two articles (it's a LONG list).

One issue would be nomenclature - "Information Commissioner" seems like it's a title that's taken up by specific countries, whereas "Data Protection Authority" seems to be a more global title.

Cross-posting this to the NDPA page to see if there's any interest there. Oblivy (talk) 14:15, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply