Talk:Informal sequel

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles

Film

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Night of the Living Dead edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Unless Romero himself put that film into the public domain on purpose, it cannot possibly be public domain yet. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 07:17, 10 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

It happened unintentionally, when a copyright notice was still required... and not included on the film. - JasonAQuest (talk) 19:01, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Can Return to Oz and Wicked really be considered unofficial sequels? edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Oz series has been public domain for some time. Plus, Disney asked and paid for the rights to use the movie series' exclusive ruby slippers from MGM, so at the very least Return to Oz did obtain some copyright consent. 208.101.161.75 (talk) 20:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic