Talk:Informal empire

Start

Informal empire is an important historiographical and definitional concept for any explanatory framework concerning Empire, and although particularly associated with the BRitish empire, is also be usefully employed in discussion of the nature of apparent aspects of contemporary American imperialism. As such, I feel that it requires an article of its own, and cannot simply be subsumed into the article on the BRitish Empire. I've got the basics going, but much can be said about the many, many scholarly references to informal empire. I would also suggest that the specific regions - at the very least China and South America - get their own sub sections in the article, dealing the the specific nature of informal empire. China in particular provides a useful case study, since other powers held informal sway here, including supposedly non-imperial nations like the United States.--Corinthian (talk) 02:29, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

South America

"South America, on the other hand, was a willing and prosperous partner in the extension of British commercial ventures, and never witnessed nor required British military power to be employed."

I know for a fact that this affirmation is false, there was an invasion of the River Plate by Britain in 1806, and much later an Anglo-French blockade that also culminated in war. I don't know if anything like that happened in the rest of South America, so I will just remove this sentence. Maybe somebody better informed on the subject can complete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ernamafer (talk • contribs) 01:21, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Other Languages

Mismatch occurred: Other languages are equivalent to British Empire instead of Informal Empire!

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Informal empire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081221073828/http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/ipe/gallagher.htm to http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/ipe/gallagher.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Portugal

I have heard Portugal described as informal empire in regard to all the British mercantile interests there. Nothing in the article about this. The UK helped keep Spain and France from conquering Portugal.

Western Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, not to mention most of Central America, have all been under heavy US influence. 2A00:23EE:1498:656E:74FB:693:E59E:D74C (talk) 11:06, 13 July 2023 (UTC)