Feedback from New Page Review process edit

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: IMO this is lacking independent sources that cover the company in depth, a requirement to meet the wp:notability requirement. IMO many other aspects, especially the technology side are useful encyclopedic information. Whether it be wP:IAR on that basis to to provide a place do develop the technology side while avoiding separate articles on products, or on the presumption that GNG sources probably exist, I'm marking it as reviewed. Happy editing!

North8000 (talk) 21:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply