Talk:Induction of regular languages

Pattern languages not regular

Pattern languages are not in general regular so they shouldn't be on this page, but should be on the general grammar induction page. - (Signature supplemented from history page:) 14:18, 6 February 2014‎ User:Aclark17

I agree. Thanks for the hint, I overlooked that fact when creating the article. Also, you are right in that "Grammar Induction" would be the best place to move. However, this article is written in a very different style, so the pattern language part won't fit in easily. Do you have an idea? (By the way: if you sign your posts, with 4 tilde chars, it is easier to understand the flow of discussion on a talk page.) - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

The Grammar Induction page has a bunch of issues -- so I will try to rewrite it when I have some time, and then the pattern language section can be moved over there. Aclark17 (talk) 20:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

That sounds good. I've move "Pattern language" to the end of the section, and put a note about non-regularity - that should suffice until you move it to its correct place. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 21:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

I moved the section today. Style issues may be less important than a misleading categorization. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:35, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Cover language

Cover language redirects here. The redirect has a stub hidden in its history, which could be uncovered and expanded if it appears desirable that the topic have its own article. —Anne Delong (talk) 22:48, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for rescuing the article. I consider it valuable, and will try to make it an own article again, after some editing. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 08:19, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Induction of regular languages. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/~stephenw/msc.ps

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:32, 31 March 2016 (UTC)