Talk:Indigenismo in Mexico

Latest comment: 3 years ago by LetsEditConstructively in topic Misunderstanding of what Indigenismo is

Merge Indigenismo in Mexico with Indigenismo edit

I appreciate the aim of focusing on "Indigenismo in Mexico" with a separate article, but frankly WP readers appear to be going to the article Indigenismo. My guess is they are not clicking on the link in the section of Indigenismo to the main Indigenismo in Mexico article. As of 4 May 2018, the pageview daily average for Indigenismo is 57/day for the last 20 days, whereas Indigenismo in Mexico gets just 16/day. The Indigenismo in Mexico article was created in 2015 by an undergraduate at Vanderbilt, User talk:Dvine16. It was initially tagged for speedy deletion because the title was misspelled. The article Indigenismo has a small paragraph on Peru, but even with material moved to Indigenismo in Mexico, the section on Mexico is still far longer. I think the readership is being diluted. Most readers probably want a quick and basic understanding of indigenismo, probably in Mexico. I propose merging Indigenismo in Mexico with Indigenismo. Indigenismo is an important topic. I would hate to lose readers who go to the basic Indigenismo article seeking in-depth information on Indigenismo in Mexico and not taking the step to click the link. I am interested to hear with other Wikipedians think. I will post this on the Indigenismo talk page as well. Amuseclio (talk) 17:23, 4 May 2018 (UTC)AmuseclioReply

Misunderstanding of what Indigenismo is edit

This article has been written by someone who does not seem to grasp what indigenismmo actually is. It is not about policies favoring indigenous minorities but about co-opting them in a process of nation-building. A lot of the content of this article is therefore irrelevant. --Frijolesconqueso (talk) 15:27, 6 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I've decided to revert the above user's edits to the page; prior to their ban they had a history of disruptive editing across a variety of Indigenous-related topics, and their edits here fit that pattern. If any of the changes were worth keeping, they would have to be much more neutrally written than this. LetsEditConstructively (talk) 12:36, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply