Can we please just slate this for deletion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doompooky (talk • contribs) 23:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC) yeah that's probably a good idea; it's a pretty embarrassing article in general. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.53.251.171 (talk) 21:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
The entry for "Indie cred" is vague and poorly worded.
The entry for "Indie cred" should be revised to regard a phenomenon and subsequent slang term regarding the 'Indie' community. --72.73.66.25 (talk) 23:03, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
This article should probably be deleted, or at least merged into the indie article. There's no good reason for this article to exist. Also, the link to Wikipedia's article for douchebag suggests that this article is a joke. Ybrik222 (talk) 22:41, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Pete Yorn? edit
Pete Yorn is not indie-credible; he has alternative cred but not indie cred, if that makes sense. For one thing, he's on Columbia (not an indie label). For another, see this article: http://www.treblezine.com/reviews/1589.html (which seems to represent general indie-rock-scene feelings about Yorn). Phair's album had no indie credibility, which is why it got reviews like this one in Pitchfork Media. 24.223.151.194 (talk) 10:27, 27 January 2008 (UTC)