This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Asia, which aims to improve the quality and status of all South Asia-related articles. For more information, please visit the Project page.South AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject South AsiaTemplate:WikiProject South AsiaSouth Asia articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This edit in January 2015 changed the understandable to me "60 to 75 years" in the lead paragraph to "1 to -1 years". This looks like vandalism to me, but as it's gone untouched for 18 months, I'm just posting here before reverting it. Anyone? --Pak21 (talk) 12:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I removed the sentence in the lede regarding Kerala. Not that it is not a Kerala symbol but rather that the placement is WP:UNDUE. The Indian elephant is a national symbol of Thailand, Laos and possibly India (as a national heritage animal – the tiger being the national animal). In India, it is a state symbol of Jharkhand, Karnataka and Kerala. These places could be listed under something like a Culture section, as other articles have done, with reliable sources. The article has a navbox and categories for symbolism, but without mention in the article. Declangi (talk) 21:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
I agree with that, and have removed it again after it was replaced. It needs a citation, which presumably won't be hard to find, but it certainly doesn't belong in the lede, since, as you say, it's not obvious why its significance to Kerala is any more important than its significance to other places. The article already has a line about it having a role in Keralan culture, in the appropriate section. Anaxial (talk) 05:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
