Talk:Indian Revenue Service
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Indian Revenue Service article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Indian Administrative Service was copied or moved into Indian Revenue Service with this edit on 05:48, 28 August 2018 (UTC). The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Unititled
editpresently the initial stage of 3 month training called Foundation Course is conducted along with all the civil serveces (IAS IPS IFS IRLY IDAS IDES ETC)at LBSNAA, Mussorie
Does it look alright now? Content should be trimmed a bit 12:02, 23 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vence1234 (talk • contribs)
File:Customs officer tysgnns03 ket 620892e.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
editThe following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion:
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Customs officer tysgnns03 ket 620892e.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:51, 10 February 2012 (UTC) |
Blanking
editShould probably point out that unreferenced =/= vandalism. However, if this is a case of copy violation (as the user seems to vaguely suggest), then please provide the link. -Cntras (talk)
- Future Perfect at Sunrise stated it was a copyvio in this diff, but he did not provide a link to where it was copied from. Klilidiplomus+Talk 12:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Did a quick search and it appears that part of the content is copied from here. The actual reasons given by the IP were not, at least on face value, a valid reason for the blanking. -Cntras (talk) 12:24, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Edit request on 27 April 2012
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please allow me to add some more to Corrupttion of IRS officers with links. Governmentetc (talk) 13:49, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- Not done and will not be done unless you can be specific on what needs to be changed. Bmusician 12:06, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Bifurcation of IRS(IT) and IRS(CIT)
editI propose to bifurcate this article in two articles, one article for Indian Revenue Service (Income Tax) and second articlefor Indian Revenue Service (Custom and Indirect Taxes). My reasons for bifurcation proposal are following:
- 1. Both services are de-facto and de-jure separate. No officer of IRS(IT) can become member of IRS(CIT) and vice versa. Also IRS(IT) is controlled by CBDT and IRS(CIT) by CBIC, and it's fact that CBDT and CBIC were constitued by separate statute. Thus both services are de-facto and de-jure separate.
- 2. Both services differ in their functions and way of their functioning. These services have different identity in eyes of general public. A good or bad action one one can not be and should not be, attributed to another service. Just mere the fact that both services work under same ministry and department doesn't make them the same service (think about yourself about other services of GOI).
Finally I would say that First Reason is more stronger and irrefutable than Second Reason. Please reply soon, I am planning to do it ASAP.JPskylight (talk) 08:41, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Major Concerrns and reforms
editI have overviewed the Wiki-Pages of various bureaucratic services which are referred as Top Echelons of Indian Bureaucracy i.e. IAS, IPS, IFS (Foreign), IFS (Forest), IRS, IRS(IT) &IRS(CIT) etc. It is very clear that all of these are not of common standard. Also it is seen that most of these sections are very poorly written in majority of cases. I propose to modify these sections in all pages as mentioned above. Your suggestions in this regard are solicited for better content, references and organization. JPskylight (talk)