Talk:Indian Peace Commission/GA1

Latest comment: 5 years ago by GreenMeansGo in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 16:39, 26 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'll start this in a day or two. auntieruth (talk) 16:39, 26 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
GreenMeansGo, I've read through this. Very interesting. So sorry for the delay. See my edits here. auntieruth (talk) 13:47, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
No worries auntieruth. I did see the tweaks you've been doing. Are there any specific additional areas of weakness you feel need addressed? GMGtalk 14:15, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • would you go through it again and clean up, similar to what i've done? Sometimes it seems repetitive, and sometimes I'm not sure what treaty we're talking about....auntieruth (talk) 14:33, 14 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Hey auntieruth. I've gone through again and tried to clear up where I can. I'm not sure how much more I can really simplify things given the breadth of the topic covering 5ish other main articles. GMGtalk 15:02, 18 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed