Talk:Indian Institute of Advanced Study

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Mikeblas in topic Fellows of the Institute

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 08:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Template:Infobox Indian Institute of Technology

edit

This article uses the template {{Infobox Indian Institute of Technology}}. This template was forked from {{Infobox university}} way back in 2006. The template {{Infobox university}} has been completely rewritten since then, and this forked template has not benefitted from these improvements. From the point of view of maintenance, a few standard templates are better than a collection of many specific ones.

As this is a Research Institute, the appropriate template would appear to be {{Infobox laboratory}}. If the template {{Infobox Indian Institute of Technology}} in this article were replaced with {{Infobox laboratory}}, no information would be lost. I therefore suggest that this be done. HairyWombat 21:58, 8 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Later. Done. HairyWombat 17:07, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Indian Institute of Advanced Study. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:47, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Fellows of the Institute

edit

This is a lengthy and detailed section. Is it usual to have a list of all the fellows? Is it usual to give details against names if there is to be such a list? It probably is not appropriate to have a Notable alumni section instead. I would think it more appropriate to refer the reader to its reference publication (where the layout of the information is also superior).--Brenont (talk) 20:51, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

I have removed this section. A comprehensive list of alumni isn't appropriate, particularly when unreferenced and no information about notability is given. -- Mikeblas (talk) 21:01, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply