Talk:India Tower

Deletion?

I request not to delete this article as this is still approved state. here is some links for that including official website http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=610347&page=8 http://www.indianexpress.com/news/not-101storey-tower-but-fsi-to-touch-sky/590901/ http://dbrealty.in/property_detail.php?id=PIN00032 ..

are you serious? deletion? how could you guys think of that? this building is currently building, and when built, it will be the second tallest building. then was different, now this beast should never be deleted in wikipedia's history as it is a perfect piece of architecture Thegreatestking (talk) 05:35, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Building design

Hmm, it's a very nice looking building - based on artist conception. Any info. on the design idea? KyuuA4 (Talk:キュウ) 04:50, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

File:India Tower Mumbai.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:India Tower Mumbai.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:30, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on India Tower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100721125756/http://www.businessworld.in/bw/2010_07_17_Showing_Unity_In_Diversity.html to http://www.businessworld.in/bw/2010_07_17_Showing_Unity_In_Diversity.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120404163718/http://www.mumbaimirror.com/index.aspx?Page=article&sectname=News%20-%20City&sectid=2&contentid=201001282010012802110650cac98edb to http://www.mumbaimirror.com/index.aspx?Page=article&sectname=News%20-%20City&sectid=2&contentid=201001282010012802110650cac98edb

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:06, 13 November 2017 (UTC)