Talk:India Juliana

Latest comment: 2 years ago by An anonymous username, not my real name in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:India Juliana/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: An anonymous username, not my real name (talk · contribs) 23:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


I would be happy to review this. I will list every critique I can think of. --An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 23:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Awesome!--🩸 𝗕𝗹𝗲𝗳𝗳 🩸 (talk) 23:10, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Review edit

Very good already. The only things I would change:

  • Remove the extra background information from the lead. It would help if it focused only on the basics of her life and historical significance.
Done
  • The term cacique is used multiple times but never defined.
Done
  • Some of the Later versions should be moved into a new section. The new section should focus on later analysis by historians, while Later versions would have versions of the original story created by non-experts.
Done
  • Legacy should contain an image.
Done
Note: I may also use a non-free image rationale like this one or this one. What do you think would be better?

I think that's all it needs, but I want to be sure. Once these are all fixed I may just pass it, or, if I notice anything, add more recommendations to this page. Excellent work so far! --An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 23:20, 13 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, @Bleff:, just letting you know that the review has been here for a couple of days, since you seem to have not noticed it. --An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 23:47, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi! You're right, I hadn't noticed. Taking care of the corrections right now. --🩸 𝗕𝗹𝗲𝗳𝗳 🩸 (talk) 13:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello @An anonymous username, not my real name:. Thank you for the review and your nice comments! I just took care of the corrections. Let me know what you think. All the best, --🩸 𝗕𝗹𝗲𝗳𝗳 🩸 (talk) 14:19, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Sorry for the delay, but your good article nomination has been passed! Congratulations! I think a fact from this page would make a nice DYK. --An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 02:17, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply