POV

edit

The below para makes unsubstantiated allegations (except mentioning that it has appeared in india today) and editorializes. Either this has to be cited properly and reworded or removed.

"It has come out in India Today[citation needed], an Indian news magazine, that I K Gujral, during his tenure as PM, as part of his doctrine, wound up the Research and Analysis Wing's (R&AW) - India's external intelligence agency - covert operations in Pakistan. Acting in the belief of earning the 'goodwill' of Pakistan, he shut down R&AW's covert activities, and gave details of R&AW's assets in Pakistan, which were painstakingly built over many years. It has been alleged that this led to physical elimination of R&AW's human assets through extrajudicial means by Pakistan's intelligence agencies.[citation needed] This has been severely criticized in the light of the November 2008 Mumbai attacks and signifies the final futility of his doctrine - belief in the 'inherent goodwill' of openly hostile neighbours. This is his defining legacy. Manmohan Singh also followed the same lines and signed a controversial pact with Pakistan in Egypt"

Removed it. Unless properly cited, this doesn't belong in the article. –SpacemanSpiff 12:10, 2 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Can you put it up back,

Here are 3 citations, all written by ex-RAW official B. Raman

http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/nov/30raman.htm

http://toprack.blogspot.com/2007/12/kaoboys-of-r-by-b-raman-and-indias.html

http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/%5Cpapers32%5Cpaper3154.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Murali83 (talkcontribs) 23:03, 31 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

article name ?

edit

Should this article be titled rather be Inder Kumar Gujral , and a redirect with I K Gujral to this page instead of the current situation ? Devopam (talk) 05:13, 23 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on I. K. Gujral. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:24, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)Reply