Talk:Independence Day (Venezuela)

Latest comment: 4 years ago by MaoGo in topic Merge proposal 6 July 2019

Merge proposal 6 July 2019 edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was merge . MaoGo (talk) 10:16, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

I propose to merge Caracas Independence Day parade (CIDP) into Independence Day (Venezuela) (IDV). I think that the content in CIDP article fits in and contributes better to IDV. Not many articles link to any of these two so it is not a big merge. Both article still need more verification, but it may improve IDV content-wise.MaoGo (talk) 18:50, 6 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

I don't see any objection to the merge. Having just done a copy edit of the article, I hope you'll try to keep as much as possible of the detailed, but mostly unsourced, description of the parade at its article. User:Jamez42 seems to want to work on the parade article, possibly with a mind to reworking it, and might want to venture an opinion here. Dhtwiki (talk) 19:49, 25 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
My only intention was to remove Venezuelanalysis as a source, as I did in other articles. I changed the "inuse" template to "under construction" since there didn't seem to be active edits in the last hours. Other than that, I support the merge and I think it's more appropriate. --Jamez42 (talk) 13:04, 26 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
The GOCEinuse template is one recognized by other guild copy editors and serves to warn them away from an article already undergoing copy editing, so there's less chance of duplication of effort. It gets removed by bot if there aren't any edits for much more than a day. Your putting up an under-construction template confused me into thinking you had plans for the article. Dhtwiki (talk) 06:38, 27 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Another person it might be worthwhile pinging is User:JMRAMOS0109, who originated "Caracas Independence Day parade" in pretty much its present form, supplying so much of the detailed description that needs better documentation. Dhtwiki (talk) 06:38, 27 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.