Talk:In the Forest of the Night
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image
editHow about this? https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRlLHvKdChDTy4Gp3xT9BC_00b8j1l9FHDGAA9VjnWZOHuGPp0v Or this? https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRzdCXfnA_V5i4bcOjq21B8y69zzErHZbN1YkTzYp5SRkpvquWe — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.201.241.239 (talk) 10:23, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- The purpose of images are to help illustrate hard-to-explain concepts within articles. DonQuixote (talk) 12:17, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Not necessarily. Episodes 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9 all used promotional images for their infobox images. (Note, this is a counter to the "hard-to-explain" concepts point, not a violation of WP:OTHER.) AlexTheWhovian (talk) 12:29, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- True, promotional materials are acceptable too, but in context of the above pictures, the main purpose of images is the above as opposed to decorations. DonQuixote (talk) 12:39, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Not necessarily. Episodes 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9 all used promotional images for their infobox images. (Note, this is a counter to the "hard-to-explain" concepts point, not a violation of WP:OTHER.) AlexTheWhovian (talk) 12:29, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Plot summary
editThere have been repeated edits that indicate the plot summary may be excessively detailed, and other edits reverting those. This has been going on for a while... can this be settled? 128.12.254.132 (talk) 09:21, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- The plot summary's length is fine. Episode articles are meant for extended summaries. Alex|The|Whovian 09:24, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Even though I think there's a strong chance that the bulk of the current plot is my own writing, it is long for a TV episode. Plot summaries on WP are to be concise, and there's clearly room to cut down. Unlike the FILM project that aims for plot summaries of no more than 700 words, TV episode don't have any similar limit though we should be able to clear 700 words without issue. --MASEM (t) 15:07, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on In the Forest of the Night. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20141026171339/https://www.the-newshub.com/stories/doctor-who-810-in-the-forest-of-the-night-review to https://www.the-newshub.com/stories/doctor-who-810-in-the-forest-of-the-night-review
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:22, 12 November 2017 (UTC)