Talk:In Which We Meet Mr. Jones/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Ruby2010 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 00:15, 4 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


Moar Fringe?

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    Prose is fine, MOS is grand.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
    Citations are all in order, nothing wrong here,
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
    Scope is just right, not too much either way.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Neutrality is fine.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    Stable and uncontroversial
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    Sole image used is fine, free from commons. Article should really have a lead image though, can we get a low-res screenshot to illustrate it?
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    All in all, I'm going to pass this as a Good Article. I don't think the lack of a lead image is enough to prevent its promotion.
Thanks for the review! Ruby2010 talk 02:46, 4 April 2011 (UTC)Reply