| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Imzadi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Develop edit
Can anyone with way more wikiknowledge than me expand on this article? This was a great book and needs a legitimate entry including plot... Trcrev 18:45, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Reviews edit
I'm going to remove the statement "One reviewer described Imzadi in 2010 as his favorite Star Trek book of all time," because it would lead someone to believe the reviewer was reviewing Imzadi. They were not; it was just an off-hand comment in a review for a different book altogether -- not very "notable" for Wikipedia. -- Mecandes (talk) 22:57, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- It was nevertheless a direct statement about the book Imzadi, and a striking affirmation of its value, in a sufficiently good source to be worth quoting. How about a statement that provides more context, e.g. "A TrekMovie.com reviewer writing in 2010 about Peter David's subsequent work mentioned that Imzadi remained his favorite Star Trek book of all time"? - Fayenatic (talk) 18:05, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Nemesis edit
Why no mention of the use of the word ' Imzadi ' in Star Trek: Nemesis ? I would do it, but I'm not much of a trekkie so, perhaps a regular contributor to this article would care to address this? - thewolfchild 04:57, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- The word was first seen used within a telepathic violation in Violations (Star Trek: The Next Generation). However, I don't think it would be appropriate to mention either of those instances here, because this article is about the novel rather than the word. Memory Alpha is the place for that. I'll just add a link to that here. – Fayenatic London 21:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)