Talk:Imprudence (Maupassant short story)

Requested move 12 July 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 00:44, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

---

Imprudence (Maupassant short story) → Imprudence – revert bold move - no other WP topic of this name – Dohn joe (talk) 22:28, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:42, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

• @Dohn joe: "Imprudence" without disambiguation means the condition of being imprudent. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:42, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
• Oppose Again WP:DISAMBIGUATION is by TOPIC NOT TITLE. Imprudence should redirect to Prudence which naturally covers the topic of imprudence. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
• Support per nom. Unnecessary disambiguation at it's finest. Calidum T|C 04:51, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Yeah well, you don't agree with guideline, same as every RM. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:26, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

• Oppose "imprudence" should redirect to prudence as {{R from antonym}} with a hatnote back to this article, since the opposite of prudence is covered in that article, and is the primary topic. -- 67.70.32.20 (talk) 06:54, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
• Oppose; I agree with the above that imprudence should redirect to Prudence. bd2412 T 15:55, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.