Talk:Impossible Princess/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Junipers Liege in topic GA Reassessment

GA Reassessment edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Commencing GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 11:17, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • "The song was a chart and critical success which demonstrated that Minogue could be accepted outside of her established genre as a dance artist." This is a very important point; although it may be common knowledge for some, it requires a source and reference. ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 11:25, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • "In 1996, Minogue collaborated with members of the alternative music band Manic Street Preachers. She first met with Manic Street Preachers' lead singer, James Dean Bradfield at his home. She brought some lyrics she had written and he strummed a Tamla Motown-type track on his guitar." - this also requires some references; unless it is all sourced to the Rolling Stones article, in which case that needs to be made clear in the article text. ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 11:27, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

This is a good article and mostly meets the criteria for a GA. However, the above need to be addressed in order for it to keep its current GA listing. ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 11:28, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have simply just removed the unsourced statements above in order that this article may comply with GA requirements. Main review to follow:

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    • Well written.  
    b (MoS):
    • Conforms to manual of style.  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    • Well referenced. Identified problems addressed.  
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    • Citations are to third party publications.  
    c (OR):
    • No evidence of OR.  
  3. It is broad in its scope.
    a (major aspects):
    • Addresses major aspect of article subject matter.  
    b (focused):
    • Remains focused. No digressions.  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy:
    • No issues concerning POV evident.  
  5. It is stable:
    • No edit wars etc.  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    • Images are properly tagged and justified.  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    • Images are accompanied by contextual captions. 
  7. Overall:
    Keep/Delist: KEEP   ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 13:51, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply