Talk:Impossible Is Nothing (Iggy Azalea song)/GA1

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Azealia911 (talk · contribs) 11:14, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


Review to come soon, looks good! Azealia911 talk 11:14, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, looking forward! CoolMarc 12:14, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

General edit

  • Some MoS:DASH violations in reference titles.
  • I'm not sure what / where these violations are. Please could you specify. Thanks. CoolMarc 06:39, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Fixed them for you Azealia911 talk
Thanks so much   CoolMarc 08:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • For the writer field, changes Azalea's credit to an unlinked 'Azalea'
I'm not confusing them, it just seems unnecessary to use a linked version of her full name when its already listed in the infobox. Azealia911 talk
Per WP:OLINK links may be repeated for reader understanding and accessibility reasons, unlike prose and track listings the Infobox should be as clear and accessible as possible. CoolMarc 08:34, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Remove the "Recorded" field altogether, it can be listed in a less crowded way in the credits section
  • Unlink the following: 'beat', 'percussion instrument', 'chimes', 'glockenspiel', 'empowerment', 'underdog'.
  • Why is there a sentence talking about a tour that the song was not a part of? Same with Reclassified? That strikes me as really odd.
  • It was a promo single for the album that was ironically not included in the reissue nor ever performed live by Azalea. It's interesting facts about the song's aftermath and not odd in my opinion. The reader would not know this without this sentence. CoolMarc 07:01, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
If you really want to include it, fine, but you need better sources. The ones provided don't justify the claim, they mention nothing about the song not being included on the tour/album. Especially in the case of the tour review, she could have just not performed the song on that particular date, hence it not being mentioned and the claim then constituting WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. Azealia911 talk
Will remove it then... CoolMarc 08:37, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Background and release edit

  • Unlink Iggy Azalea, interpolation and pre-order
  • I haven't unlinked Iggy Azalea per WP:OLINK, but have unlinked the other two. CoolMarc 07:07, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Composition edit

  • Add "that runs for a duration of three minutes and ten seconds" to the end of "hip hop song"
  •   Not done There's nothing key or important about it being the length of a typical popular song, the length was not spoken of by third party sources. CoolMarc 07:12, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • What does "sparkle-like" mean?
  • "Aspirational in its lyrics" needs rewording
  • The Quietus should be in italics

Critical reception edit

  • "named it a highlight" → "deemed it a highlight"
  • PopMatters should be in italics

Track listing edit

  • I'd advise removing this section altogether, it's quite redundant. A track listing should generally only be used at a very minimum if there are at least two tracks in a single (EG. an explicit and clean version of the same song), just one track shouldn't really require one.

Credits and personnel edit

  • Move the reference sentence to the opening of the section.
  •   Not done sections/sentences are referenced at the end and not the beginning. CoolMarc 07:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Like I said in my comments of the infobox, move the recording studio information here.
  •   Not done I personally don't think a studio location equates to personnel. I've already mentioned this in the prose as well. CoolMarc 07:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Link the first appearance of the relevant positions, EG. [[Songwriter|writer]]
  • I found this to be unnecessary. They are very basic terms that have been linked in the prose where necessary. CoolMarc 07:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Charts edit

  • Add |+ Weekly charts to the table
  •   Not done there are no two chart types to distinguish it from. Hence redundant. CoolMarc 07:26, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

References edit

  • #4 — [[MOBO Awards]] → [[MOBO Awards|MOBO]]
  • It's specifically attributed to MOBO Awards in the source. CoolMarc 07:35, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • #8 — Needs an accessdate
  • Not when an archivedate is already present. CoolMarc 07:35, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Yes it does, archivedate shows when the link was archived, accessdate shows when the reference was accessed. I could use a wayback link from last year but the accessdate would still be today, while the archive date would be something like July 1, 2014. Azealia911 talk
  Done CoolMarc 09:03, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • #11 — Music Times shouldn't be in italics
  • #12 — Drowned in Sound should be in italics
  • #22 — The Quietus should be in italics
  • #34 — PopMatters should be in italics

External links edit

  • Is the SoundCloud link her official SoundCloud?
  • Status:   On-hold for seven days while improvements are made.

Good luck   Azealia911 talk 19:55, 29 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Azealia911 thank you for the review. I've replied above! CoolMarc 07:42, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Replied with further comments. Azealia911 talk 08:08, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Azealia911 I've addressed your further comments above. Thank you. CoolMarc 09:09, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Passing   Azealia911 talk 10:19, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply