Talk:Imperial College of Business Studies
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Imperial College of Business Studies article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright problem removed edit
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.imperialcollege.innovators.edu.pk/?q=node/1. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 09:49, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- Note that even if the copyright issue were resolved, this material had a promotional tone completely unsuitable for an encyclopedia article, which requires a neutral point of view. See Wikipedia:Your first article and Wikipedia:College and university article guidelines for advice. JohnCD (talk) 09:49, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
December 2013 edit
I have once again removed material copied from the institution's website which, quite apart from being a copyright violation, was written in a promotional tone quite inappropriate for an encyclopedia article, which requires a neutral point of view. Expansion of the article in neutral, factual terms cited to reliable sources would be welcomed, but re-addition of promotional and/or copied material will be reverted and may lead to deletion of the whole article. JohnCD (talk) 16:32, 8 December 2013 (UTC)