Talk:Immigration to Pakistan/GA2

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jhbuk in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jhbuk (talk) 14:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    A few typos I'm correcting. Lead might need some rewriting?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    No references in "Demographics", but otherwise very good
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    The article essentially describes current immigration patterns, but gives little information about background: Why are there only two short sentences about immigration before 2001? The article completely neglects historical immigration; No information about public opinion; Not much information about the effects the immigration has had
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Reasonable
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Only one image; if you can get any more it would help. No alt text, but that is not required for GA
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Fail for now: Not convinced about completeness