Talk:Immigration Bridge

Why is the Immigration Bridge here?

I thought I did create a talk section? Sorry for that.

I can't work out WHY??? The Immigration Bridge is here - it isn't built, it isn't real, it's a concept!! All the other buildings here are built where this isn't, it's a pipe dream.

This is why I deleted it, it doesn't belong in a section with Old Parliament House, The Hyatt, Black Mountain Towe, etc - as they are all built - this isn't.

It belongs under a section for future building in Canberra - this is why I have delete it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CanberraBulldog (talk • contribs) 00:30, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Whatever your thoughts on this article are, blanking the page is not a valid option. The inclusion criteria appear to be meet with the given references. That it is not built is not a reason for deletion. I am unclear what you refer to about it being in a section with things that are built. 66.57.4.150 (talk) 03:51, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

If you have a look, everything in this category is built the catoegory is titled: Buildings and structures in Canberra. The Immigration Bridge is not a Building nor a Structure - built being a stucture a physical structure.

I have no thoughts on the Immigration Bridge I am just following the Title of the Category and the criteria of all the other 'built' structures and buildings here.

Just because it is referenced doesn't mean it belongs here, if that was the case you could put so many other 'non-built' structure and buildings here.

Again, this is why I am deleting it - it is not built, it is a concept it is not a Canberra structure or Building - it is a concept, when/if it is built it can be resubmitted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CanberraBulldog (talk • contribs) 04:48, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Immigration Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111104084151/http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/local/news/general/clamour-to-scuttle-bridge-proposal/1473959.aspx?page=3 to http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/local/news/general/clamour-to-scuttle-bridge-proposal/1473959.aspx?page=3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)