Talk:Imamate in Twelver doctrine
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Merge
editShi'a Imam is basicly the same topic, any reason for not merging? --Striver 03:31, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- I say delete and redirect immediately. This is very redundant and POV. Cuñado - Talk 17:11, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Merge. Zaidi 10:03, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- I've started a discussion for the merge suggestion that I put on the article page. Please go to Talk:Imamah (Shi'a doctrine). --Bluerain (talk) 11:42, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
This entire entry is problematic because someone has put the wrong word in Arabic! Please, it's a'imah, not imamah. The concept in English is "imamate."
Rename
editRename Imamah into Imamah (Shi'a twelver Islam) so it corresponds to Imamah (Shi'a Ismaili doctrine), then rename Shi'a Imam into Imamah (Shi'a Islam), change the redirect that Imamah is by then into a redirect to Imamah (disambig):
- Imamah -> Imamah (disambig) - (not existing now)
- Imamah (Shi'a doctrine) - (presently Shi'a Imam)
- Imamah (Shi'a twelver doctrine) - (presently Imamah)
- Imamah (Shi'a Ismaili doctrine)
--Striver 19:30, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
No comments? --Striver 02:09, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Then ill go ahead. --Striver 11:33, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Twelver sources about the Imamah
editHere is some twelver sources about the Imamah. I dont know how to fit them in into the article, so i will post them here and hope that somebody will make them fit in.
- Rejection of Imamah is kufr, just as rejection of Nubuwwah (prophethood) is kufr (1)
- Imamah is a universal grace (lutf ‘amm) while Nubuwwah (prophethood) is a special grace (lutf khass), because it is possible that a specific period in time can be void of a living Nabi, while the same is not true for the Imam. To reject the universal grace is worse than to reject the special grace (2)
- Imamah is a divine station, just like Nubuwwah. Just as Allah chooses whomsoever He wants to for Nubuwwah and Risalah ... similarly, for Imamah too, He selects whomsoever He wishes. (3)
- The Imams possess more knowledge than the Prophets (4)
- The Imams know about the past, the present and the future (5)
- The Imams know when they will die, and they die only by their choice (6)
- 1) Stated by: Abu Ja‘far at-Tusi, called Shaykh at-Ta’ifah (died 460AH)in Talkhis ash-Shafi vol. 4 p. 131 (Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah, Qum, 3rd ed. 1394)
- 2) Stated by: Ibn Mutahhar al-Hilli (died 726AH) in al-Alfayn p. 3 (al-Maktabah al-Haydariyyah, Najaf, 3rd ed. 1388)
- 3) Stated by: Allamah Muhammad Husayn Kashif al-Ghita in Asl ash-shia wa-Usuluha p. 58 (Mu’ssasat al-A‘lami, Beirut)
- 4) Stated by: ‘Allamah Muhammad Baqir al-Majlisi in Bihar al-Anwar vol. 26 pp. 194-200
- 5) Muhammad Yaqoub Al-Kulayni in Usul Al-Kafi vol. 1:260
- 6) Muhammad Yaqoub Al-Kulayni in Usul Al-Kafi vol. 1:258
- can someone clarify these facts? It seems to me that the Shia Imamah doctrines regard that the Imams are more divine than prophet himself. Shouldn't the muslims regard the prophet especially the prophet Muhammad as the most divine people? Pejuang bahasa 17:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Arguments deleted
editanon has tried to argue against the shia idea of Imamah in this article. In this article, we should focus on presenting and explaining the Shia doctrine of Imamah, not argue for it nor argue against it. Please refrain from doing this, this is not ShiaChat.com. However, feel free to visit the mentioned site if you like to discuss the Shia doctrine of Imamah. Have a nice day. Hamid-Masri 11:12, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Rename Article
editI prefer to have it as Imamate (Twelver Shi`i Doctrine). I once learned in school that every word in a title should be capitalized; Imamah (Shi'a twelver doctrine). M.K.Muhammadi (talk) 02:52, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
A New Sructure
edit- @Sa.vakilian and Mhhossein: I suggest a new structure for the article.
- The Concept of Imamah
- The Necessity of Imamah
- Theological Aspect
- The Station of Imams
- Imam as Mediator
- Imam as Wali
- Imam as Hujjah
- Political Aspect
- Theological Aspect
- Necessary Attributes of Imams
- Appointment by Allah (Nass)
- Ismah
- Hikmah (widom)
- Superiority (Afdaliyyah)
- The necessity of Recognizing Imams
- The necessity of obeying Imams
- Guidance is only Through Imams
- Argument by Quran
- Argument by Hadith
- Argument by Reason
- History of the Concept of Imamah
Salman mahdi (talk) 12:40, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you. Good idea. Ideology has negative connotation. Instead, we can say "Theological aspect" and "Political aspect". We should add "Imam as Hujjat" under Theological aspect. Let's ask @User:Kazemita1 to join us.--Seyyed(t-c) 07:56, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with Seyed's suggestion that "theological aspect" is probably a better choice.--Kazemita1 (talk) 00:05, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
@Sa.vakilian, Mhhossein, and Kazemita1: I suggest
- Two sections of The Knowledge of Imam and Hikmah to be merged.
- How much detailed be "The Knowledge of Imam"?
- To pay attention to the ancestors of Imams, as it is noted in Shia theology.Salman mahdi (talk) 16:05, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
I agree with the first. The second question needs separate discussion. It is difficult to answer. The third one can be covered in Infallibility (Ismah). --Seyyed(t-c) 16:09, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- Same with me.--Kazemita1 (talk) 23:49, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- @Sa.vakilian, Salman mahdi, and Kazemita1: Salaam alaykom. I think some of the titles should change. I can't understand how we can have titles such as 'Necessity of Imamah' when we're writing for an encyclopedia! Mhhossein (talk) 17:09, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- Wa Alaykum Assalaam. Even when writing for a secular encyclopedia, there is benefit in describing inner religious beliefs and traits. For example, a secular reader might want to know why in the first place Shia's think Imamate is necessary. Hope that helps.--Kazemita1 (talk) 23:49, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- @Mhhossein: "The Necessity of Imamah" relates to the theological belief that there should be always an alive Imam on the earth. I think it is too important in Shia theology that deserves a separate section. However the title may not be clear enough and make misunderstanding.--Seyyed(t-c) 18:57, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Wa Alaykum Assalaam. Even when writing for a secular encyclopedia, there is benefit in describing inner religious beliefs and traits. For example, a secular reader might want to know why in the first place Shia's think Imamate is necessary. Hope that helps.--Kazemita1 (talk) 23:49, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- Kazemita1,@Sa.vakilian and Mhhossein: A Hadith from Imam Baqir narrates the necessary attributes of Imamah as: Nass, Ismah, Hikmah, Nur. I think it's better we change the structure according to Ma'sum.Salman mahdi (talk) 10:52, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Yes and No, I think we can gather all of them in one section as the "characteristics of Imam" with four subsection.--Seyyed(t-c) 10:10, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Wilayah
edit@Sa.vakilian, Mhhossein, and Kazemita1: How much do we pay attention to Walayah?Salman mahdi (talk) 16:49, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- @Salman mahdi: As I proposed before, we'd better have a separate article for Walayah! meanwhile, we should mention this topic briefly here. Mhhossein (talk) 17:20, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Esoteric and exoteric interpretation of Imamat Doctrine among Shias
edituser:Kazemita1,user:Mhhossein,user:Salman mahdi,user:Faizhaider; As you may know there are a range of interpretation of Imamate Doctrine from Zahir to Batin. In one side, some scholars emphasize on sociopolitical guardianship (Wilayah) as well as instructing and promoting Fiqh by the Imams. On the other hand, some scholars focus on spiritual role and esoteric guidance as well as existential guardianship (Wilayah) of Imams. The later one can be found in Henry Corbin's History of Islamic philosophy which follows Sayyid Haydar Amuli and while the former one is available in Musa Sadr's criticism on the Arabic translation of that book. There is also an interpretation which tries to gather both of them like Ruhollah Khomeini's ideas. Due to NPOV policy of wikipedia, we should cover all of these ideas, while this article as well as Twelve Imams tend to the esoteric interpretation. I'd like to know your ideas.--Seyyed(t-c) 08:20, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- You have my blessing. Go ahead and add the content.--Kazemita1 (talk) 07:42, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- user:Kazemita1,user:Mhhossein,Seyyed,user:Faizhaider, First of all u may make clear your use of the Words Wilayah & Walayah, as their meaning in Arabic differs and in Eng the article of Wilayah is not related to our discussion. Concerning my little information, I had in mind that Walayah always relates to the spiritual and esoterical aspect of religion.But may I ask u in which books we can study the ideas of Khomeini?Salman mahdi (talk) 10:12, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- Ideas of Ayatollah Khomeini to best of my knowledge are largely revolving around Guardianship of the Islamic Jurists which are not related to this article as far as I know. But since you asked they can be found here.--Kazemita1 (talk) 15:51, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Repetitions
editThe names of the Imams is repeated two times. One of them must be deleted, which one?Salman mahdi (talk) 18:55, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
DoneSeyyed(t-c) 03:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- The repetitions and sourceless material are going to be deleted.Salman mahdi (talk) 12:35, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
The Table of Imams
edit@Sa.vakilian, Mhhossein, and Kazemita1: I think that this table is related to Twelve Imams ( we can give the link) and we can bring the name of Imams according to, for example, hadith of Lawh.Hum?--Salman mahdi (talk) 13:20, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- @Salman mahdi: Do you mean to replace the table with a less space consuming stuff? Mhhossein (talk) 17:31, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- @Mhhossein: I mean to delete the table and to replace a hadith.--Salman mahdi (talk) 13:23, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
- @Salman mahdi: Do you mean to replace the table with a less space consuming stuff? Mhhossein (talk) 17:31, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Copy-editing
edit@Salman mahdi: I have some queries on the first part of the article, which I hope you can answer so that I can copy-edit::
- I thought Muhammad was the First Prophet, not the Final Prophet as the Lead says. I suspect "Final" is used there to mean "ultimate".
- What does "their sufferings were a means of divine grace to their devotees" mean?
- The word nass in the Lead is described as "divine decree", but in the wikilnked article it is described as "legal injunction".
- The meanings given for the words hikmah and 'Aql in the Lead are different from the meanings given in the wikilinked articles for those words. Readers will be puzzled by the differences.
- The Lead says, "The Imamat, or belief in the divine guide ...", but the wiki article on Imamate says Imamate is a doctrine, not a "belief" in the sense the word "belief" seems to be used there. Could you clarify, please?
- It says, "The Shia believe that divine wisdom ... is the source of the souls of the Prophets and Imams". I think "Prophets" will need explanation or a wikilink for the reader.
- Exactly what "Imamate" means is very unclear from the Lead and section 1. It is described as a belief , then a universal authority, and then it says, "it means the legitimate successor to the Islamic community who are just the family of the prophet". Can you clarify, please?
- What does "it means the legitimate successor to the Islamic community who are just the family of the prophet'" mean exactly?
- What does "Imamate is under investigation from three perpectives" mean?
- What does "the term Imamate reflects the spiritual and socio-political leadership" mean?
- In section 1 and its heading, the terms "Imamah" and "Imamate" seem to be used interchangeably. This will puzzle the reader (it did me). Are they different or the same? The text needs to clarify the difference for the reader. ~ P-123 (talk) 18:27, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Note for editors: I was asked by Salman madhi for some help with copy-editing this article. ~ P-123 (talk) 20:01, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
@P-123:
- With my great thanks for ur copy-editing
- It was wrong
- It is a belief of Shia like "the crucifixion of Christ as a sacrifice to achieve atonement".
- Nass means a divine appointment or designatin.
- If u take care of adjectives before the words, perhaps the links could help u. divine wisdom and esoteric knowledge.
- Imam is a person that shia has 12 Imams but Imamate is the name of his office and the belief to the Imams is said "Imamate" and also in shia theology, it is named a doctrine.
- We can link it to the prophets of Islam.
- Imamate as I described is a belief that just the descendants of the prophet can inherit the right to lead the community.
- Shia believe that just the descendants of the prophet have the right to govern over society.
- we can study on Imamate from three points of view.
- Imam has the right to lead the community socially, politically and spiritually.
- I should consider.Salman mahdi (talk) 14:30, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- 2. I understand that, but still don't understand what "their sufferings were a means of divine grace to their devotees" means.
- 3. But nass is wikilinked to an article which says it means "legal decree", there is no mention of "divine". That was my point.
- 4. The descriptions in the links do not match the way the words are used in the text. For example, hikmah is described in the link as "wisdom" and in the article it means "esoteric knowledge". 'Aql is described as "divine knowledge" in the text, and in the article as the "intellect".
- 5. So "Imamate" means the name of the office and is also the name of a doctrine? What does the belief to the Imams is said "Imamate" mean? ~ P-123 (talk) 15:57, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
@P-123:
- 2. It means by the sufferings that the Imams tolerate, their followers will get rid of sins by God; it is a metaphysical matter and a belief that is not in accordance with the material world as I said it is sth similar to the christian idea about the crucification of the Christ.
- 3. I can not talk about that wikilink, but according to Shia theology, it is a divine appointment or designatin.
- 4. Aql means divine wisdom and wisdom means esoteric knowledge.
- 5. When u believe to an idea, it is expressed by a word or a name, Imamte is the name of a belief that God has appointed some people as Imam for the people to follow them.
- Is it clear? if any other thing please ask and thanks for ur copy editing.Salman mahdi (talk) 18:56, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
@Salman mahdi: I still think readers will be confused if they click on the links for nass, 'Aql and hikmah and see that the descriptions do not match what the article says these words mean. How can Imamate can mean a belief, where elsewhere it seems to mean the doctrine of "leadership"? I think perhaps you mean doctrine, not belief. I have copy-edited the sentence, but I think you will have to ask someone who is more familiar with the meaning of Imamate to check that it is accurate. ~ P-123 (talk) 08:53, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Questions on section 2, "The Necessity of Imamah"
edit- There is a quotation in the middle but it is unclear which parts are actual quotation and which are not.
- What does "The prophetic mission must be followed by a keeper of the Quran because it contains esoteric depth, superficial contradictions and hidden meaning" mean?
- It then says, "Divine knowledge is only attainable through divine revelation or inspiration", but the Lead says, "The Imam is not the recipient of a divine revelation ..." which looks contradictory. I think this needs clarifying for sake of the general reader.
- "Divine law" is wikilinked to Sharia, but is sharia really "divine" law, i.e. is "divine" really the right word there?
- What is "walayah" in the last line? ~ P-123 (talk) 19:51, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Dear @P-123:,
- With my great thanks,
- Done
- As the Quran has an esoteric depth, superficial contradictions and hidden meaning, after the prophet, there must be an especialist in this erea until the line of the prophecy to be continued who is called Imam that one of his roles is to express the hidden meaning of the Quran.
- Imam gets the divine knowledge but through inspiration not revelation.
- Corbin has used these two words as synonyms.Divine law = Sharia.
- I add a link that could be helpful.Salman mahdi (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Edit
editHow is this edit an improvement on what it replaces? The grammar is bad and the meaning is unclear.
Under "Political aspect", it says, "Although Imam has a political role, but his Imamah does not depend on his getting this role.[47] the political According to the verse 5:55, because the absolute authority belongs to Allah, He can grant this authority to whomever He wishes as Guardians. Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr believes that the political and spiritual dimensions are inseparable." This does not make sense. ~ P-123 (talk) 17:19, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- With thanks,
- You can correct it.
- One of the roles of the imams is the political leadership of the community, but it is not the foundation of Imamah, that is if imam be not the leader, he be not imam; he can be imam and be not the leader of the society. As God is the creator of the world, He is the real Owner of the world, so the authority of the world belongs to Him and He can give this authority to whomever He desires; so He desires to choose the imams as His authorities over the community. Is it clear?--Salman mahdi (talk) 14:34, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Renaming
editAs the names of Imamah and Imamate are synonyms and these different names confuse the readers, the name of the article should be changed to Imamah.Salman mahdi (talk) 06:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Imamate (Twelver doctrine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080329020223/http://www.balagh.net/english/shia/shia/10.htm to http://www.balagh.net/english/shia/shia/10.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080618012237/http://www.ummah.net/khoei/imam.htm to http://www.ummah.net/khoei/imam.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060211091253/http://www.answering-ansar.org/answers/creed_of_shia_explained/en/chap6.php to http://www.answering-ansar.org/answers/creed_of_shia_explained/en/chap6.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:45, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Imamah (Shia) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC)