Talk:Imaginary logarithm

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Carifio24 in topic Proof

Proof edit

I don't care for the first step:

 

This happens to be true for positive x and for the usual branch of the logarithm, but it's a little too glib. Melchoir 14:29, 20 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I see what you're saying, but I still think it would work. For example, if x=3 and b=5, then
 
meaning that the property still holds since
  because   Carifio24 16:19, 21 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well there doesn't seem to be any more dispute, so I'll remove the tag. -- He Who Is[ Talk ] 04:34, 6 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I see that this is considered for deletion, so if it's deleted then this is pointless, but I can agree now that the title is wrong, perhaps 'logarithm of a negative number' would be a better choice? --Carifio24 16:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)Reply