 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
Cleanup edit
The article presently reads like spam (and it's written by User:Imagekind), though I think Weak Keep because it seems to be a notable service, similar in some ways to Myspace. It definitely needs revisions, though. JRHorse 02:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Good progress but will need some more changes to conform to WP:STYLE. JRHorse 14:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- I edited some of the text... I've heard some good / bad things about this company (like any company) but overall what I have heard has been overwhelmingly positive. Keith736 19:34, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- I reworked the text "Imagekind seems to be a pretty good service, they have super-high quality printing. They're kind of the new kid on the block in this space, but their prints are really nice and they allow you as the artist to control the markup. You can actually make money from selling your artwork through them ;)" since this is non-encyclopedic writing and sounds more like a personal opinion than objective facts. (User:Revised 23:10, 29 December 2006 )
- I created categories for this page Tulip241 00:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
More cleanup done re: advert language. This article may need to be cheacked for Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 15:48, 25 January 2008 (UTC)